Derivation and survey of closed-form analytical solutions to the Weber electrodynamic equations.
Introduction
Weber electrodynamics features a velocity-dependent potential that couples position and velocity, making most solutions involve elliptic integrals. However, several special cases admit elementary closed-form solutions. This document catalogs these cases systematically.
We work in absolute (Gaussian) units unless otherwise specified.
Preliminaries
Reduced Mass Formulation
For a two-body system, we work in the center-of-mass frame with reduced mass:
μ=m1+m2m1m2
Weber Potential Energy
For attractive charges (q1q2=−κ where κ>0):
U=−rκ(1−2c2r˙2)
For repulsive charges (q1q2=+k where k>0):
U=+rk(1−2c2r˙2)
Key Parameter
Throughout, we define the Weber length scale:
a=c2∣q1q2∣
This has dimensions of (mass × length) and characterizes the relativistic correction strength.
This matches the classical Coulomb result (quarter period of a degenerate ellipse).
Solution 3: Circular Orbits
Key Insight
For circular motion, r=const, so r˙=0 and r¨=0. The Weber force reduces exactly to the Coulomb force!
Force Balance
For attractive charges in circular orbit:
μrω2=r2κ
Angular Velocity (Kepler's Third Law)
ω2=μr3κ
This is identical to the Coulomb/Kepler result!
Orbital Period
T=2πκμr3
Physical Interpretation
Since the radial velocity vanishes for circular orbits, the velocity-dependent Weber correction disappears entirely. Circular orbits in Weber electrodynamics are exact copies of Keplerian circular orbits.
Solution 4: Repulsive Scattering from Rest
Setup
Repulsive charges: q1q2=+k
Zero angular momentum: L=0
Particles released from rest at separation r0
Initial conditions: r(0)=r0, r˙(0)=0
Energy
E=+r0k
Velocity Equation
r˙2=μr−a2k(r/r0−1)
where a=k/c2.
Note: This requires r>a/μ for physical solutions. Typically a≪μr0, so this is satisfied.
Asymptotic Velocity
As r→∞:
r˙∞=μr02k
This is the same as the Coulomb result—the Weber correction affects the trajectory but not the asymptotic speed (conservation of energy).
Time as Function of Position
Define u=r/r0 (so u≥1), and γ=μr0a (typically γ≪1).
t(r)=r02kμr0∫1r/r0u−1u−γdu
For γ=0 (Coulomb limit):
t=r02kμr0[u(u−1)+arcosh(u)]1r/r0
For small γ, the Weber correction adds a perturbative term.
Solution 5: Equilibrium and Critical Points
Radial Equilibrium
For the effective radial potential with angular momentum L:
Ueff(r,r˙)=2μr2L2−rκ(1−2c2r˙2)
At circular orbit equilibrium (r˙=0):
drdUeffr˙=0=−μr3L2+r2κ=0
rcirc=μκL2
This is identical to the Coulomb result.
Orbital Energy at Circular Orbit
Ecirc=2μrcirc2L2−rcircκ=−2L2μκ2
Again, identical to Coulomb.
Solution 6: Small Oscillations About Circular Orbit
Effective Spring Constant
For small radial perturbations ξ=r−rcirc about a circular orbit:
ξ¨+ωr2ξ=0
The radial oscillation frequency is:
ωr=ωϕ=μrcirc3κ
Since ωr=ωϕ, orbits close after one revolution—the ellipse does not precess (to first order).
Precession in Weber (Higher Order)
For general (non-circular) orbits, Weber electrodynamics does predict orbital precession due to the velocity-dependent terms. However, this requires solving the full equations numerically or via perturbation theory.
Solution 7: Head-On Collision Velocity
Maximum Approach Velocity (Attractive)
For particles falling from infinity with E=0:
r˙2=μr+a2κ
As r→0:
r˙max=a2κ=κ2κc2=c2
This exceeds the speed of light! This indicates that Weber electrodynamics, as a non-relativistic theory, breaks down at small separations where velocities become relativistic.
Critical Separation
The velocity reaches c at:
rc=μc2κ=μa
For r<rc, the theory predicts superluminal velocities, signaling its breakdown.
Solution 8: Turning Points (Repulsive Scattering with Angular Momentum)
Setup
Repulsive charges: q1q2=+k
Angular momentum: L=0
Energy: E>0
Effective Potential
Ueff=2μr2L2+rk(1−2c2r˙2)
Turning Point Condition
At the distance of closest approach rmin, r˙=0:
E=2μrmin2L2+rmink
This is identical to the Coulomb turning point equation! Solving:
rmin=2Ek+k2+2EL2/μ
The turning point in Weber electrodynamics (at r˙=0) coincides exactly with the Coulomb prediction.
Summary Table
| Case | Conditions | Solution Type |
|------|------------|---------------|
| Zero-energy radial infall | E=0, L=0, attractive | r(t)=μ1[(A−Bt)2/3−a] |
| Infall from rest | r˙0=0, L=0, attractive | t(r) via arcsin (elementary) |
| Circular orbits | r˙=0, attractive | Same as Kepler |
| Repulsive scattering | r˙0=0, L=0, repulsive | r˙∞=2k/(μr0) |
| Turning points | r˙=0, repulsive | Same as Coulomb |
Dimensionless Formulation
Characteristic Scales
For a system with κ=∣q1q2∣, we can define:
Length: r0 (initial separation)
Time: τ0=μr03/κ
Velocity: v0=κ/(μr0)
Dimensionless Variables
ρ=r/r0,τ=t/τ0,ϵ=v0/c=μr0c2κ
Dimensionless Energy Equation (Radial)
E~=21ρ˙2−ρ1+2ρϵ2ρ˙2
where E~=Eμr0/κ and ρ˙=dρ/dτ.
The parameter ϵ controls the strength of Weber corrections. For ϵ≪1, Coulomb behavior dominates.
Physical Validity Regime
Weber electrodynamics is valid when:
v≪c (non-relativistic velocities)
r≫a/μ=∣q1q2∣/(μc2) (above the critical separation)
Radiation effects are negligible
For electrons: a/μ≈2.8×10−15 m (classical electron radius).
For macroscopic charged objects, Weber corrections are typically negligible.
Appendix: Derivation of Arcsin Solution
Starting from:
r˙2=μr+a2κ(1−r/r0)
For infall (r˙<0):
dt=−2κ(1−r/r0)μr+adr
Substituting v=1−r/r0, r=r0(1−v), dr=−r0dv:
dt=r02κvμr0(1−v)+adv=r02κμr0+av1−βvdv
where β=μr0/(μr0+a).
Using the integral:
∫0vu1−βudu=β1[arcsin(βv)+βv(1−βv)]
We obtain the closed-form result.
References
Weber, W. (1846). Elektrodynamische Maassbestimmungen