A reformulation of the Clemente & Assis (1991) analytical solution for Weber electrodynamics in terms of Gauss and Appell hypergeometric functions.
1. Physical Setup
Weber Force Law
The force between two charged particles under Weber's electrodynamics:
F 1 , 2 = − U 0 r ^ r 2 ( 1 + r r ¨ c 2 − r ˙ 2 2 c 2 ) \mathbf{F}_{1,2} = -U_0 \frac{\hat{r}}{r^2} \left(1 + \frac{r\ddot{r}}{c^2} - \frac{\dot{r}^2}{2c^2}\right) F 1 , 2 = − U 0 r 2 r ^ ( 1 + c 2 r r ¨ − 2 c 2 r ˙ 2 )
where U 0 = q 1 q 2 U_0 = q_1 q_2 U 0 = q 1 q 2 for electromagnetic interactions, r r r is the separation, and c c c is the speed of light.
Conserved Quantities
In the center-of-mass frame with reduced mass μ = m 1 m 2 / ( m 1 + m 2 ) \mu = m_1 m_2/(m_1 + m_2) μ = m 1 m 2 / ( m 1 + m 2 ) :
Angular momentum:
L = μ r 2 θ ˙ L = \mu r^2 \dot{\theta} L = μ r 2 θ ˙
Weber energy:
W = μ 2 ( r ˙ 2 + r 2 θ ˙ 2 ) + U 0 r ( 1 − r ˙ 2 2 c 2 ) W = \frac{\mu}{2}\left(\dot{r}^2 + r^2\dot{\theta}^2\right) + \frac{U_0}{r}\left(1 - \frac{\dot{r}^2}{2c^2}\right) W = 2 μ ( r ˙ 2 + r 2 θ ˙ 2 ) + r U 0 ( 1 − 2 c 2 r ˙ 2 )
2. Core Variables
Characteristic Length Scale
K = U 0 μ c 2 K = \frac{U_0}{\mu c^2} K = μ c 2 U 0
This is the Weber correction length—the scale at which velocity-dependent effects become significant.
Dimensionless Radial Coordinate
x 2 = 1 − K r x^2 = 1 - \frac{K}{r} x 2 = 1 − r K
The physical radius is recovered via r = K / ( 1 − x 2 ) r = K/(1 - x^2) r = K / ( 1 − x 2 ) .
Turning Points
The squared turning point coordinates are:
x 1 , 2 2 = 1 + μ K U 0 L 2 [ 1 ± 1 + 2 W L 2 μ U 0 2 ] x_{1,2}^2 = 1 + \frac{\mu K U_0}{L^2}\left[1 \pm \sqrt{1 + \frac{2WL^2}{\mu U_0^2}}\right] x 1 , 2 2 = 1 + L 2 μ K U 0 [ 1 ± 1 + μ U 0 2 2 W L 2 ]
Introducing the dimensionless parameters:
α ≡ μ K U 0 L 2 = U 0 2 μ c 2 L 2 , β ≡ 1 + 2 W L 2 μ U 0 2 \alpha \equiv \frac{\mu K U_0}{L^2} = \frac{U_0^2}{\mu c^2 L^2}, \qquad \beta \equiv 1 + \frac{2WL^2}{\mu U_0^2} α ≡ L 2 μ K U 0 = μ c 2 L 2 U 0 2 , β ≡ 1 + μ U 0 2 2 W L 2
the turning points simplify to:
x 1 2 = 1 + α ( 1 + β ) , x 2 2 = 1 + α ( 1 − β ) x_1^2 = 1 + \alpha(1 + \sqrt{\beta}), \qquad x_2^2 = 1 + \alpha(1 - \sqrt{\beta}) x 1 2 = 1 + α ( 1 + β ) , x 2 2 = 1 + α ( 1 − β )
Elliptic Modulus
k 2 = x 1 2 − x 2 2 x 1 2 = 2 α β 1 + α ( 1 + β ) k^2 = \frac{x_1^2 - x_2^2}{x_1^2} = \frac{2\alpha\sqrt{\beta}}{1 + \alpha(1 + \sqrt{\beta})} k 2 = x 1 2 x 1 2 − x 2 2 = 1 + α ( 1 + β ) 2 α β
3. Hypergeometric Preliminaries
Gauss Hypergeometric Function
2 F 1 ( a , b ; c ; z ) = ∑ n = 0 ∞ ( a ) n ( b ) n ( c ) n z n n ! {}_2F_1(a, b; c; z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(a)_n (b)_n}{(c)_n} \frac{z^n}{n!} 2 F 1 ( a , b ; c ; z ) = n = 0 ∑ ∞ ( c ) n ( a ) n ( b ) n n ! z n
where ( a ) n = a ( a + 1 ) ⋯ ( a + n − 1 ) (a)_n = a(a+1)\cdots(a+n-1) ( a ) n = a ( a + 1 ) ⋯ ( a + n − 1 ) is the Pochhammer symbol.
Appell F 1 F_1 F 1 Function
For incomplete elliptic integrals, we require the two-variable Appell function:
F 1 ( α ; β 1 , β 2 ; γ ; x , y ) = ∑ m , n = 0 ∞ ( α ) m + n ( β 1 ) m ( β 2 ) n ( γ ) m + n x m y n m ! n ! F_1(\alpha; \beta_1, \beta_2; \gamma; x, y) = \sum_{m,n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(\alpha)_{m+n}(\beta_1)_m (\beta_2)_n}{(\gamma)_{m+n}} \frac{x^m y^n}{m!\, n!} F 1 ( α ; β 1 , β 2 ; γ ; x , y ) = m , n = 0 ∑ ∞ ( γ ) m + n ( α ) m + n ( β 1 ) m ( β 2 ) n m ! n ! x m y n
4. Complete Elliptic Integrals as Hypergeometric Functions
First Kind
K ( k ) = π 2 2 F 1 ( 1 2 , 1 2 ; 1 ; k 2 ) K(k) = \frac{\pi}{2} \,{}_2F_1\!\left(\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; 1; k^2\right) K ( k ) = 2 π 2 F 1 ( 2 1 , 2 1 ; 1 ; k 2 )
Power series expansion:
K ( k ) = π 2 ∑ n = 0 ∞ [ ( 2 n − 1 ) ! ! ( 2 n ) ! ! ] 2 k 2 n K(k) = \frac{\pi}{2} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \left[\frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}\right]^2 k^{2n} K ( k ) = 2 π n = 0 ∑ ∞ [ ( 2 n )!! ( 2 n − 1 )!! ] 2 k 2 n
Second Kind
E ( k ) = π 2 2 F 1 ( − 1 2 , 1 2 ; 1 ; k 2 ) E(k) = \frac{\pi}{2} \,{}_2F_1\!\left(-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; 1; k^2\right) E ( k ) = 2 π 2 F 1 ( − 2 1 , 2 1 ; 1 ; k 2 )
Power series expansion:
E ( k ) = π 2 [ 1 − ∑ n = 1 ∞ ( ( 2 n − 1 ) ! ! ( 2 n ) ! ! ) 2 k 2 n 2 n − 1 ] E(k) = \frac{\pi}{2} \left[1 - \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left(\frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}\right)^2 \frac{k^{2n}}{2n-1}\right] E ( k ) = 2 π [ 1 − n = 1 ∑ ∞ ( ( 2 n )!! ( 2 n − 1 )!! ) 2 2 n − 1 k 2 n ]
Explicit first terms:
E ( k ) = π 2 ( 1 − 1 4 k 2 − 3 64 k 4 − 5 256 k 6 − 175 16384 k 8 − ⋯ ) E(k) = \frac{\pi}{2}\left(1 - \frac{1}{4}k^2 - \frac{3}{64}k^4 - \frac{5}{256}k^6 - \frac{175}{16384}k^8 - \cdots\right) E ( k ) = 2 π ( 1 − 4 1 k 2 − 64 3 k 4 − 256 5 k 6 − 16384 175 k 8 − ⋯ )
5. Incomplete Elliptic Integrals
Second Kind via Appell F 1 F_1 F 1
The incomplete elliptic integral of the second kind admits the hypergeometric representation:
E ( ϕ , k ) = sin ϕ ⋅ F 1 ( 1 2 ; − 1 2 , 1 2 ; 3 2 ; sin 2 ϕ , k 2 sin 2 ϕ ) E(\phi, k) = \sin\phi \cdot F_1\!\left(\frac{1}{2}; -\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; \frac{3}{2}; \sin^2\phi,\, k^2\sin^2\phi\right) E ( ϕ , k ) = sin ϕ ⋅ F 1 ( 2 1 ; − 2 1 , 2 1 ; 2 3 ; sin 2 ϕ , k 2 sin 2 ϕ )
Alternative Series Representation
Setting s = sin ϕ s = \sin\phi s = sin ϕ and Δ = 1 − k 2 s 2 \Delta = \sqrt{1 - k^2 s^2} Δ = 1 − k 2 s 2 :
E ( ϕ , k ) = ∫ 0 ϕ 1 − k 2 sin 2 θ d θ = s ⋅ ∑ n = 0 ∞ ( − 1 / 2 ) n n ! ⋅ k 2 n 2 n + 1 ⋅ 2 F 1 ( − n , 1 2 ; 3 2 ; s 2 ) E(\phi, k) = \int_0^\phi \sqrt{1 - k^2\sin^2\theta}\,d\theta = s \cdot \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1/2)_n}{n!} \cdot \frac{k^{2n}}{2n+1} \cdot {}_2F_1\!\left(-n, \frac{1}{2}; \frac{3}{2}; s^2\right) E ( ϕ , k ) = ∫ 0 ϕ 1 − k 2 sin 2 θ d θ = s ⋅ n = 0 ∑ ∞ n ! ( − 1/2 ) n ⋅ 2 n + 1 k 2 n ⋅ 2 F 1 ( − n , 2 1 ; 2 3 ; s 2 )
Practical Expansion for Small k 2 k^2 k 2
E ( ϕ , k ) = ϕ − k 2 4 ( 2 ϕ − sin 2 ϕ ) − k 4 64 ( 6 ϕ − 4 sin 2 ϕ + 1 2 sin 4 ϕ ) + O ( k 6 ) E(\phi, k) = \phi - \frac{k^2}{4}\left(2\phi - \sin 2\phi\right) - \frac{k^4}{64}\left(6\phi - 4\sin 2\phi + \frac{1}{2}\sin 4\phi\right) + O(k^6) E ( ϕ , k ) = ϕ − 4 k 2 ( 2 ϕ − sin 2 ϕ ) − 64 k 4 ( 6 ϕ − 4 sin 2 ϕ + 2 1 sin 4 ϕ ) + O ( k 6 )
6. Trajectory Solutions in Hypergeometric Form
Attractive Case (U 0 < 0 U_0 < 0 U 0 < 0 )
The angular coordinate as a function of the radial variable:
θ A ( x ) = ± 2 ∣ x 1 ∣ E ( ϕ , k ) \theta^A(x) = \pm 2|x_1| E(\phi, k) θ A ( x ) = ± 2∣ x 1 ∣ E ( ϕ , k )
where ϕ = arcsin ( x 1 2 − x 2 ) / ( x 1 2 − x 2 2 ) \phi = \arcsin\sqrt{(x_1^2 - x^2)/(x_1^2 - x_2^2)} ϕ = arcsin ( x 1 2 − x 2 ) / ( x 1 2 − x 2 2 ) .
Hypergeometric form:
θ A ( x ) = ± 2 ∣ x 1 ∣ sin ϕ ⋅ F 1 ( 1 2 ; − 1 2 , 1 2 ; 3 2 ; sin 2 ϕ , k 2 sin 2 ϕ ) \boxed{\theta^A(x) = \pm 2|x_1| \sin\phi \cdot F_1\!\left(\frac{1}{2}; -\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; \frac{3}{2}; \sin^2\phi,\, k^2\sin^2\phi\right)} θ A ( x ) = ± 2∣ x 1 ∣ sin ϕ ⋅ F 1 ( 2 1 ; − 2 1 , 2 1 ; 2 3 ; sin 2 ϕ , k 2 sin 2 ϕ )
Repulsive Case (U 0 > 0 U_0 > 0 U 0 > 0 )
θ R ( x ) = ± 2 ∣ x 1 ∣ [ E ( k ) − E ( ϕ , k ) ] \theta^R(x) = \pm 2|x_1|\bigl[E(k) - E(\phi, k)\bigr] θ R ( x ) = ± 2∣ x 1 ∣ [ E ( k ) − E ( ϕ , k ) ]
Hypergeometric form:
θ R ( x ) = ± ∣ x 1 ∣ [ π 2 F 1 ( − 1 2 , 1 2 ; 1 ; k 2 ) − 2 sin ϕ ⋅ F 1 ( 1 2 ; − 1 2 , 1 2 ; 3 2 ; sin 2 ϕ , k 2 sin 2 ϕ ) ] \boxed{\theta^R(x) = \pm |x_1| \left[\pi\,{}_2F_1\!\left(-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; 1; k^2\right) - 2\sin\phi \cdot F_1\!\left(\frac{1}{2}; -\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; \frac{3}{2}; \sin^2\phi,\, k^2\sin^2\phi\right)\right]} θ R ( x ) = ± ∣ x 1 ∣ [ π 2 F 1 ( − 2 1 , 2 1 ; 1 ; k 2 ) − 2 sin ϕ ⋅ F 1 ( 2 1 ; − 2 1 , 2 1 ; 2 3 ; sin 2 ϕ , k 2 sin 2 ϕ ) ]
7. Perihelion Precession
Full Orbital Period in Angle
For bound orbits (attractive, W < 0 W < 0 W < 0 ), one complete radial oscillation spans:
Δ θ = 4 ∣ x 1 ∣ E ( k ) \Delta\theta = 4|x_1| E(k) Δ θ = 4∣ x 1 ∣ E ( k )
Hypergeometric form:
Δ θ = 2 π ∣ x 1 ∣ 2 F 1 ( − 1 2 , 1 2 ; 1 ; k 2 ) \boxed{\Delta\theta = 2\pi |x_1| \,{}_2F_1\!\left(-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; 1; k^2\right)} Δ θ = 2 π ∣ x 1 ∣ 2 F 1 ( − 2 1 , 2 1 ; 1 ; k 2 )
Precession Per Orbit
The perihelion advance beyond 2 π 2\pi 2 π :
δ θ = Δ θ − 2 π = 2 π [ ∣ x 1 ∣ 2 F 1 ( − 1 2 , 1 2 ; 1 ; k 2 ) − 1 ] \delta\theta = \Delta\theta - 2\pi = 2\pi\left[|x_1|\,{}_2F_1\!\left(-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; 1; k^2\right) - 1\right] δ θ = Δ θ − 2 π = 2 π [ ∣ x 1 ∣ 2 F 1 ( − 2 1 , 2 1 ; 1 ; k 2 ) − 1 ]
Small-∣ K ∣ |K| ∣ K ∣ Approximation
In the limit of weak Weber corrections (∣ K ∣ ≪ a |K| \ll a ∣ K ∣ ≪ a , where a a a is the semi-major axis):
δ θ ≈ π ∣ K ∣ a ( 1 − e 2 ) \delta\theta \approx \frac{\pi |K|}{a(1-e^2)} δ θ ≈ a ( 1 − e 2 ) π ∣ K ∣
where e e e is the orbital eccentricity. The full hypergeometric expression captures all orders in ∣ K ∣ |K| ∣ K ∣ .
8. Scattering Deflection Angles
For open trajectories (W ≥ 0 W \geq 0 W ≥ 0 ), define ϕ ∗ = arcsin ( x 1 2 − 1 ) / ( x 1 2 − x 2 2 ) \phi^* = \arcsin\sqrt{(x_1^2 - 1)/(x_1^2 - x_2^2)} ϕ ∗ = arcsin ( x 1 2 − 1 ) / ( x 1 2 − x 2 2 ) .
Attractive Scattering
α A = 4 E ( ϕ ∗ , k ) ( 1 − k 2 sin 2 ϕ ∗ ) 1 / 2 − π \alpha^A = \frac{4E(\phi^*, k)}{(1 - k^2\sin^2\phi^*)^{1/2}} - \pi α A = ( 1 − k 2 sin 2 ϕ ∗ ) 1/2 4 E ( ϕ ∗ , k ) − π
Hypergeometric form:
α A = 4 sin ϕ ∗ ( 1 − k 2 sin 2 ϕ ∗ ) 1 / 2 F 1 ( 1 2 ; − 1 2 , 1 2 ; 3 2 ; sin 2 ϕ ∗ , k 2 sin 2 ϕ ∗ ) − π \boxed{\alpha^A = \frac{4\sin\phi^*}{(1 - k^2\sin^2\phi^*)^{1/2}} F_1\!\left(\frac{1}{2}; -\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; \frac{3}{2}; \sin^2\phi^*,\, k^2\sin^2\phi^*\right) - \pi} α A = ( 1 − k 2 sin 2 ϕ ∗ ) 1/2 4 sin ϕ ∗ F 1 ( 2 1 ; − 2 1 , 2 1 ; 2 3 ; sin 2 ϕ ∗ , k 2 sin 2 ϕ ∗ ) − π
Repulsive Scattering
α R = π − 4 E ( k ) − E ( ϕ ∗ , k ) ( 1 − k 2 sin 2 ϕ ∗ ) 1 / 2 \alpha^R = \pi - 4\,\frac{E(k) - E(\phi^*, k)}{(1 - k^2\sin^2\phi^*)^{1/2}} α R = π − 4 ( 1 − k 2 sin 2 ϕ ∗ ) 1/2 E ( k ) − E ( ϕ ∗ , k )
Hypergeometric form:
α R = π − 2 ( 1 − k 2 sin 2 ϕ ∗ ) 1 / 2 [ π 2 F 1 ( − 1 2 , 1 2 ; 1 ; k 2 ) − 2 sin ϕ ∗ F 1 ( 1 2 ; − 1 2 , 1 2 ; 3 2 ; sin 2 ϕ ∗ , k 2 sin 2 ϕ ∗ ) ] \boxed{\alpha^R = \pi - \frac{2}{(1 - k^2\sin^2\phi^*)^{1/2}}\left[\pi\,{}_2F_1\!\left(-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; 1; k^2\right) - 2\sin\phi^* F_1\!\left(\frac{1}{2}; -\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; \frac{3}{2}; \sin^2\phi^*,\, k^2\sin^2\phi^*\right)\right]} α R = π − ( 1 − k 2 sin 2 ϕ ∗ ) 1/2 2 [ π 2 F 1 ( − 2 1 , 2 1 ; 1 ; k 2 ) − 2 sin ϕ ∗ F 1 ( 2 1 ; − 2 1 , 2 1 ; 2 3 ; sin 2 ϕ ∗ , k 2 sin 2 ϕ ∗ ) ]
9. Recovery of Coulomb Limit
In the limit c → ∞ c \to \infty c → ∞ (equivalently K → 0 K \to 0 K → 0 ), we have:
∣ x 1 ∣ → 1 |x_1| \to 1 ∣ x 1 ∣ → 1
k → 0 k \to 0 k → 0
2 F 1 ( − 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 ; 1 ; 0 ) = 1 {}_2F_1(-1/2, 1/2; 1; 0) = 1 2 F 1 ( − 1/2 , 1/2 ; 1 ; 0 ) = 1
F 1 ( 1 / 2 ; − 1 / 2 , 1 / 2 ; 3 / 2 ; s 2 , 0 ) = 2 F 1 ( 1 / 2 , − 1 / 2 ; 3 / 2 ; s 2 ) F_1(1/2; -1/2, 1/2; 3/2; s^2, 0) = {}_2F_1(1/2, -1/2; 3/2; s^2) F 1 ( 1/2 ; − 1/2 , 1/2 ; 3/2 ; s 2 , 0 ) = 2 F 1 ( 1/2 , − 1/2 ; 3/2 ; s 2 )
The trajectory equations reduce to the standard Kepler/Rutherford conic sections:
r = L 2 / μ ∣ U 0 ∣ 1 + e cos θ r = \frac{L^2/\mu|U_0|}{1 + e\cos\theta} r = 1 + e cos θ L 2 / μ ∣ U 0 ∣
where e = 1 + 2 W L 2 / μ U 0 2 e = \sqrt{1 + 2WL^2/\mu U_0^2} e = 1 + 2 W L 2 / μ U 0 2 is the eccentricity.
10. Computational Implementation
Direct Hypergeometric Evaluation
For numerical work, use standard library implementations of 2 F 1 {}_2F_1 2 F 1 (available in SciPy, GSL, mpmath, etc.).
Complete elliptic integral:
E(k) = (π/2) * hypergeom2F1(-0.5, 0.5, 1.0, k²)
Appell F 1 F_1 F 1 via Numerical Integration
When library support for F 1 F_1 F 1 is unavailable, use the integral representation:
F 1 ( α ; β 1 , β 2 ; γ ; x , y ) = Γ ( γ ) Γ ( α ) Γ ( γ − α ) ∫ 0 1 t α − 1 ( 1 − t ) γ − α − 1 ( 1 − t x ) − β 1 ( 1 − t y ) − β 2 d t F_1(\alpha; \beta_1, \beta_2; \gamma; x, y) = \frac{\Gamma(\gamma)}{\Gamma(\alpha)\Gamma(\gamma-\alpha)} \int_0^1 t^{\alpha-1}(1-t)^{\gamma-\alpha-1}(1-tx)^{-\beta_1}(1-ty)^{-\beta_2}\,dt F 1 ( α ; β 1 , β 2 ; γ ; x , y ) = Γ ( α ) Γ ( γ − α ) Γ ( γ ) ∫ 0 1 t α − 1 ( 1 − t ) γ − α − 1 ( 1 − t x ) − β 1 ( 1 − t y ) − β 2 d t
Series Truncation for Moderate k 2 k^2 k 2
For k 2 < 0.5 k^2 < 0.5 k 2 < 0.5 , truncating the 2 F 1 {}_2F_1 2 F 1 series at n = 10 n = 10 n = 10 typically gives 10+ digits of accuracy. For k 2 → 1 k^2 \to 1 k 2 → 1 (near-parabolic orbits), use Landen's transformation or arithmetic-geometric mean methods.
11. Connection to Symplectic Integration
The hypergeometric formulation provides:
Exact benchmarks for validating numerical integrators
Asymptotic expansions for initializing perturbation methods
Analytic derivatives for sensitivity analysis via hypergeometric differentiation formulas
For structure-preserving numerical schemes, the energy W W W and angular momentum L L L should be monitored against these exact relations.
References
Clemente, R. A. & Assis, A. K. T. (1991). Two-Body Problem for Weber-Like Interactions . Int. J. Theor. Phys. 30 (4), 537–545.
Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. (1972). Handbook of Mathematical Functions , Ch. 15 (Hypergeometric), Ch. 17 (Elliptic).
NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, https://dlmf.nist.gov/