Deep Research

Weber Two-Body Dynamics via Hypergeometric Series

Reformulation of the Clemente & Assis (1991) analytical Weber solution in terms of Gauss and Appell hypergeometric functions.

A reformulation of the Clemente & Assis (1991) analytical solution for Weber electrodynamics in terms of Gauss and Appell hypergeometric functions.


1. Physical Setup

Weber Force Law

The force between two charged particles under Weber's electrodynamics:

F1,2=U0r^r2(1+rr¨c2r˙22c2)\mathbf{F}_{1,2} = -U_0 \frac{\hat{r}}{r^2} \left(1 + \frac{r\ddot{r}}{c^2} - \frac{\dot{r}^2}{2c^2}\right)

where U0=q1q2U_0 = q_1 q_2 for electromagnetic interactions, rr is the separation, and cc is the speed of light.

Conserved Quantities

In the center-of-mass frame with reduced mass μ=m1m2/(m1+m2)\mu = m_1 m_2/(m_1 + m_2):

Angular momentum:

L=μr2θ˙L = \mu r^2 \dot{\theta}

Weber energy:

W=μ2(r˙2+r2θ˙2)+U0r(1r˙22c2)W = \frac{\mu}{2}\left(\dot{r}^2 + r^2\dot{\theta}^2\right) + \frac{U_0}{r}\left(1 - \frac{\dot{r}^2}{2c^2}\right)

2. Core Variables

Characteristic Length Scale

K=U0μc2K = \frac{U_0}{\mu c^2}

This is the Weber correction length—the scale at which velocity-dependent effects become significant.

Dimensionless Radial Coordinate

x2=1Krx^2 = 1 - \frac{K}{r}

The physical radius is recovered via r=K/(1x2)r = K/(1 - x^2).

Turning Points

The squared turning point coordinates are:

x1,22=1+μKU0L2[1±1+2WL2μU02]x_{1,2}^2 = 1 + \frac{\mu K U_0}{L^2}\left[1 \pm \sqrt{1 + \frac{2WL^2}{\mu U_0^2}}\right]

Introducing the dimensionless parameters:

αμKU0L2=U02μc2L2,β1+2WL2μU02\alpha \equiv \frac{\mu K U_0}{L^2} = \frac{U_0^2}{\mu c^2 L^2}, \qquad \beta \equiv 1 + \frac{2WL^2}{\mu U_0^2}

the turning points simplify to:

x12=1+α(1+β),x22=1+α(1β)x_1^2 = 1 + \alpha(1 + \sqrt{\beta}), \qquad x_2^2 = 1 + \alpha(1 - \sqrt{\beta})

Elliptic Modulus

k2=x12x22x12=2αβ1+α(1+β)k^2 = \frac{x_1^2 - x_2^2}{x_1^2} = \frac{2\alpha\sqrt{\beta}}{1 + \alpha(1 + \sqrt{\beta})}

3. Hypergeometric Preliminaries

Gauss Hypergeometric Function

2F1(a,b;c;z)=n=0(a)n(b)n(c)nznn!{}_2F_1(a, b; c; z) = \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(a)_n (b)_n}{(c)_n} \frac{z^n}{n!}

where (a)n=a(a+1)(a+n1)(a)_n = a(a+1)\cdots(a+n-1) is the Pochhammer symbol.

Appell F1F_1 Function

For incomplete elliptic integrals, we require the two-variable Appell function:

F1(α;β1,β2;γ;x,y)=m,n=0(α)m+n(β1)m(β2)n(γ)m+nxmynm!n!F_1(\alpha; \beta_1, \beta_2; \gamma; x, y) = \sum_{m,n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(\alpha)_{m+n}(\beta_1)_m (\beta_2)_n}{(\gamma)_{m+n}} \frac{x^m y^n}{m!\, n!}

4. Complete Elliptic Integrals as Hypergeometric Functions

First Kind

K(k)=π22F1 ⁣(12,12;1;k2)K(k) = \frac{\pi}{2} \,{}_2F_1\!\left(\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; 1; k^2\right)

Power series expansion:

K(k)=π2n=0[(2n1)!!(2n)!!]2k2nK(k) = \frac{\pi}{2} \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \left[\frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}\right]^2 k^{2n}

Second Kind

E(k)=π22F1 ⁣(12,12;1;k2)E(k) = \frac{\pi}{2} \,{}_2F_1\!\left(-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; 1; k^2\right)

Power series expansion:

E(k)=π2[1n=1((2n1)!!(2n)!!)2k2n2n1]E(k) = \frac{\pi}{2} \left[1 - \sum_{n=1}^{\infty} \left(\frac{(2n-1)!!}{(2n)!!}\right)^2 \frac{k^{2n}}{2n-1}\right]

Explicit first terms:

E(k)=π2(114k2364k45256k617516384k8)E(k) = \frac{\pi}{2}\left(1 - \frac{1}{4}k^2 - \frac{3}{64}k^4 - \frac{5}{256}k^6 - \frac{175}{16384}k^8 - \cdots\right)

5. Incomplete Elliptic Integrals

Second Kind via Appell F1F_1

The incomplete elliptic integral of the second kind admits the hypergeometric representation:

E(ϕ,k)=sinϕF1 ⁣(12;12,12;32;sin2ϕ,k2sin2ϕ)E(\phi, k) = \sin\phi \cdot F_1\!\left(\frac{1}{2}; -\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; \frac{3}{2}; \sin^2\phi,\, k^2\sin^2\phi\right)

Alternative Series Representation

Setting s=sinϕs = \sin\phi and Δ=1k2s2\Delta = \sqrt{1 - k^2 s^2}:

E(ϕ,k)=0ϕ1k2sin2θdθ=sn=0(1/2)nn!k2n2n+12F1 ⁣(n,12;32;s2)E(\phi, k) = \int_0^\phi \sqrt{1 - k^2\sin^2\theta}\,d\theta = s \cdot \sum_{n=0}^{\infty} \frac{(-1/2)_n}{n!} \cdot \frac{k^{2n}}{2n+1} \cdot {}_2F_1\!\left(-n, \frac{1}{2}; \frac{3}{2}; s^2\right)

Practical Expansion for Small k2k^2

E(ϕ,k)=ϕk24(2ϕsin2ϕ)k464(6ϕ4sin2ϕ+12sin4ϕ)+O(k6)E(\phi, k) = \phi - \frac{k^2}{4}\left(2\phi - \sin 2\phi\right) - \frac{k^4}{64}\left(6\phi - 4\sin 2\phi + \frac{1}{2}\sin 4\phi\right) + O(k^6)

6. Trajectory Solutions in Hypergeometric Form

Attractive Case (U0<0U_0 < 0)

The angular coordinate as a function of the radial variable:

θA(x)=±2x1E(ϕ,k)\theta^A(x) = \pm 2|x_1| E(\phi, k)

where ϕ=arcsin(x12x2)/(x12x22)\phi = \arcsin\sqrt{(x_1^2 - x^2)/(x_1^2 - x_2^2)}.

Hypergeometric form:

θA(x)=±2x1sinϕF1 ⁣(12;12,12;32;sin2ϕ,k2sin2ϕ)\boxed{\theta^A(x) = \pm 2|x_1| \sin\phi \cdot F_1\!\left(\frac{1}{2}; -\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; \frac{3}{2}; \sin^2\phi,\, k^2\sin^2\phi\right)}

Repulsive Case (U0>0U_0 > 0)

θR(x)=±2x1[E(k)E(ϕ,k)]\theta^R(x) = \pm 2|x_1|\bigl[E(k) - E(\phi, k)\bigr]

Hypergeometric form:

θR(x)=±x1[π2F1 ⁣(12,12;1;k2)2sinϕF1 ⁣(12;12,12;32;sin2ϕ,k2sin2ϕ)]\boxed{\theta^R(x) = \pm |x_1| \left[\pi\,{}_2F_1\!\left(-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; 1; k^2\right) - 2\sin\phi \cdot F_1\!\left(\frac{1}{2}; -\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; \frac{3}{2}; \sin^2\phi,\, k^2\sin^2\phi\right)\right]}

7. Perihelion Precession

Full Orbital Period in Angle

For bound orbits (attractive, W<0W < 0), one complete radial oscillation spans:

Δθ=4x1E(k)\Delta\theta = 4|x_1| E(k)

Hypergeometric form:

Δθ=2πx12F1 ⁣(12,12;1;k2)\boxed{\Delta\theta = 2\pi |x_1| \,{}_2F_1\!\left(-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; 1; k^2\right)}

Precession Per Orbit

The perihelion advance beyond 2π2\pi:

δθ=Δθ2π=2π[x12F1 ⁣(12,12;1;k2)1]\delta\theta = \Delta\theta - 2\pi = 2\pi\left[|x_1|\,{}_2F_1\!\left(-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; 1; k^2\right) - 1\right]

Small-K|K| Approximation

In the limit of weak Weber corrections (Ka|K| \ll a, where aa is the semi-major axis):

δθπKa(1e2)\delta\theta \approx \frac{\pi |K|}{a(1-e^2)}

where ee is the orbital eccentricity. The full hypergeometric expression captures all orders in K|K|.


8. Scattering Deflection Angles

For open trajectories (W0W \geq 0), define ϕ=arcsin(x121)/(x12x22)\phi^* = \arcsin\sqrt{(x_1^2 - 1)/(x_1^2 - x_2^2)}.

Attractive Scattering

αA=4E(ϕ,k)(1k2sin2ϕ)1/2π\alpha^A = \frac{4E(\phi^*, k)}{(1 - k^2\sin^2\phi^*)^{1/2}} - \pi

Hypergeometric form:

αA=4sinϕ(1k2sin2ϕ)1/2F1 ⁣(12;12,12;32;sin2ϕ,k2sin2ϕ)π\boxed{\alpha^A = \frac{4\sin\phi^*}{(1 - k^2\sin^2\phi^*)^{1/2}} F_1\!\left(\frac{1}{2}; -\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; \frac{3}{2}; \sin^2\phi^*,\, k^2\sin^2\phi^*\right) - \pi}

Repulsive Scattering

αR=π4E(k)E(ϕ,k)(1k2sin2ϕ)1/2\alpha^R = \pi - 4\,\frac{E(k) - E(\phi^*, k)}{(1 - k^2\sin^2\phi^*)^{1/2}}

Hypergeometric form:

αR=π2(1k2sin2ϕ)1/2[π2F1 ⁣(12,12;1;k2)2sinϕF1 ⁣(12;12,12;32;sin2ϕ,k2sin2ϕ)]\boxed{\alpha^R = \pi - \frac{2}{(1 - k^2\sin^2\phi^*)^{1/2}}\left[\pi\,{}_2F_1\!\left(-\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; 1; k^2\right) - 2\sin\phi^* F_1\!\left(\frac{1}{2}; -\frac{1}{2}, \frac{1}{2}; \frac{3}{2}; \sin^2\phi^*,\, k^2\sin^2\phi^*\right)\right]}

9. Recovery of Coulomb Limit

In the limit cc \to \infty (equivalently K0K \to 0), we have:

  • x11|x_1| \to 1
  • k0k \to 0
  • 2F1(1/2,1/2;1;0)=1{}_2F_1(-1/2, 1/2; 1; 0) = 1
  • F1(1/2;1/2,1/2;3/2;s2,0)=2F1(1/2,1/2;3/2;s2)F_1(1/2; -1/2, 1/2; 3/2; s^2, 0) = {}_2F_1(1/2, -1/2; 3/2; s^2)

The trajectory equations reduce to the standard Kepler/Rutherford conic sections:

r=L2/μU01+ecosθr = \frac{L^2/\mu|U_0|}{1 + e\cos\theta}

where e=1+2WL2/μU02e = \sqrt{1 + 2WL^2/\mu U_0^2} is the eccentricity.


10. Computational Implementation

Direct Hypergeometric Evaluation

For numerical work, use standard library implementations of 2F1{}_2F_1 (available in SciPy, GSL, mpmath, etc.).

Complete elliptic integral:

E(k) = (π/2) * hypergeom2F1(-0.5, 0.5, 1.0, k²)

Appell F1F_1 via Numerical Integration

When library support for F1F_1 is unavailable, use the integral representation:

F1(α;β1,β2;γ;x,y)=Γ(γ)Γ(α)Γ(γα)01tα1(1t)γα1(1tx)β1(1ty)β2dtF_1(\alpha; \beta_1, \beta_2; \gamma; x, y) = \frac{\Gamma(\gamma)}{\Gamma(\alpha)\Gamma(\gamma-\alpha)} \int_0^1 t^{\alpha-1}(1-t)^{\gamma-\alpha-1}(1-tx)^{-\beta_1}(1-ty)^{-\beta_2}\,dt

Series Truncation for Moderate k2k^2

For k2<0.5k^2 < 0.5, truncating the 2F1{}_2F_1 series at n=10n = 10 typically gives 10+ digits of accuracy. For k21k^2 \to 1 (near-parabolic orbits), use Landen's transformation or arithmetic-geometric mean methods.


11. Connection to Symplectic Integration

The hypergeometric formulation provides:

  1. Exact benchmarks for validating numerical integrators
  2. Asymptotic expansions for initializing perturbation methods
  3. Analytic derivatives for sensitivity analysis via hypergeometric differentiation formulas

For structure-preserving numerical schemes, the energy WW and angular momentum LL should be monitored against these exact relations.


References

  • Clemente, R. A. & Assis, A. K. T. (1991). Two-Body Problem for Weber-Like Interactions. Int. J. Theor. Phys. 30(4), 537–545.
  • Abramowitz, M. & Stegun, I. A. (1972). Handbook of Mathematical Functions, Ch. 15 (Hypergeometric), Ch. 17 (Elliptic).
  • NIST Digital Library of Mathematical Functions, https://dlmf.nist.gov/